LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

Conflicting views on the buyback of shares continue to baffle investors

Private equity and venture capital investors often favour preference shares as an investment instrument over equity shares. This is because preference shares have precedence with respect to the repayment of capital at the time of liquidation and are also entitled to a defined dividend in priority over other shareholders of a company.

To qualify as foreign direct investment (FDI) under India’s FDI policy, preference shares are required to be compulsorily and mandatorily convertible into equity shares. Under the FDI policy, if preference shares are not compulsorily convertible (i.e. they are optionally/partly/non-convertible preference shares), then such foreign investment would be treated as debt and would be subject to stringent guidelines on external commercial borrowing.

The buyback of shares is one of many common exit rights incorporated by investors in their agreements. However, investors often remain oblivious of the legal challenges involved in implementing a buyback by an investee company. This article seeks to identify the issues faced in the implementation of a buyback of compulsorily convertible preference shares (CCPS) by an unlisted company in India under company law and foreign exchange management law.

Company law requirements

There are two types of share capital – equity and preference. India’s Companies Act, 1956, permits companies to buy back preference shares from their shareholders.

Under section 77A of the act, a company is permitted to buy back shares from its shareholders subject to certain terms and conditions. For instance, a company can only use money from its free reserves, securities premium account or the proceeds of any shares or securities (other than preference shares) to buy back CCPS. The company’s articles of association should authorize the buyback and the CCPS should be fully paid up. In addition, the amount paid as the buyback price should not exceed 25% of the total paid-up share capital and free reserves of the company.

Once the buyback has been completed, a company cannot issue any more preference shares for at least six months (other than bonus shares or issues of shares in pursuance of existing obligations). Following the buyback, the debt owed by a company cannot be more than twice the capital and free reserves of the company. The term “debt” includes all the secured and unsecured debt of a company.

If the proposed buyback of CCPS involves consideration equal to or less than 10% of the total paid-up equity capital and free reserves, the buyback can be approved through a resolution passed by the company’s board of directors. However, a company would not be able to carry out another purchase of its shares until 365 days after a buyback approved only by its board unless it has the approval of its shareholders by way of a special resolution.

[ihc-hide-content ihc_mb_type=”show” ihc_mb_who=”3″ ihc_mb_template=”2″ ]

Exchange control challenges

A key concern when implementing a buyback of securities issued to foreign investors is whether a company can buy back the CCPS held by these investors without converting them into equity shares.

Equity or debt?: Preference shares must be compulsorily and mandatorily convertible into equity shares in order to qualify as foreign direct investment.
Equity or debt?: Preference shares must be compulsorily and mandatorily convertible into equity shares in order to qualify as foreign direct investment.

The FDI policy, as mentioned earlier, requires preference shares issued to foreign investors to be compulsorily convertible. There are conflicting views on whether a buyback of CCPS issued to a foreign investor is permissible under India’s FDI policy. One argument is that such a buyback would be akin to the redemption of preference shares. This is because, on effecting the buyback, the holders of the CCPS receive money and the CCPS would then stand extinguished, which is exactly the position in the case of a redemption. Such an action would indirectly run afoul of the FDI policy, which states that preference shares should be compulsorily convertible.

The contrary view is that the buyback of CCPS cannot be treated on par with the redemption of securities since buybacks are subject to a clear and defined set of restrictions under the Companies Act. Furthermore, paragraph 3.4.4(g) of the FDI policy grants general permission for the transfer of shares by a non-resident to an Indian company under a buyback and/or capital reduction scheme of a company. Although “shares” have not been defined under the FDI policy, CCPS could be included since the policy permits investments in compulsorily convertible shares. Based on the above, it can be argued that a buyback of CCPS from a foreign investor by an Indian company is permitted under the FDI policy.

If a buyback of CCPS issued to a foreign entity is treated as a redemption, then the buyback may not be possible through the automatic route and would require specific government approval. As always, the government reserves the right to refuse or grant such permission.

Exercising caution

Faced with uncertainty on account of such conflicting views, companies often consider taking a cautious route by converting CCPS before a buyback. The result is that once CCPS are converted into equity, they would have fulfilled the requirement of being “compulsorily convertible”. In this case, the subsequent buyback of the resultant equity shares would not be questioned on the grounds that it would amount to the redemption of CCPS since the CCPS would no longer exist.

Need for clarification

Although the Ministry of Commerce reversed the restrictions it imposed on in-built options last year, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) continues to question exits on this premise. The uncertainty with respect to the legality of buyback of CCPS adds a further layer to this issue.

Until the government or the RBI clarifies its position on these aspects, exits by foreign investors will continue to be complex.

[/ihc-hide-content]

Kunal Arora and Priyanka Dixit Sibal are lawyers at MNK Law Offices in New Delhi. MNK Law Offices is a full-service law firm. It advises a wide spectrum of clients on matters related to mergers and acquisitions, private equity, infrastructure, real estate, and corporate and commercial law. The firm also represents clients in a wide range of litigation and arbitration cases related to both civil and commercial matters. The firm can be reached at contactus@mnklaw.com.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link